By subscribing, you agree to receive The Workplace Compass articles, publication updates and occasional resources by email. You may unsubscribe at any time. Please read our Privacy Policy.
What readers will learn
Why UK and US employment laws can sound remarkably similar while producing very different legal outcomes.
How to translate familiar terms—such as vicarious liability, respondeat superior, victimisation, retaliation, unfair dismissal and wrongful termination—without confusing analogy with legal equivalence.
When an employer may be legally responsible for an employee’s wrongdoing, discrimination or workplace misconduct.
Why “employment opportunity” does not automatically mean “employer responsibility”—and how courts assess whether conduct is sufficiently connected to the job.
How the UK’s statutory protection against unfair dismissal differs fundamentally from the American presumption of employment at will.
How constructive dismissal in Great Britain compares with constructive discharge in the United States—and why resignation alone does not establish either claim.
How British principles of mutual trust and confidence compare with American doctrines of good faith, fair dealing and implied contractual protection.
How employment status is determined—and why calling someone an “employee,” “worker” or “independent contractor” does not necessarily decide their legal rights.
How direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, disparate treatment and disparate impact address similar workplace problems through different legal tests.
How reasonable adjustments under British law compare with reasonable accommodation under American disability law.
Why victimisation has a precise legal meaning in UK equality law, while retaliation in the US depends on the particular statute and protected activity involved.
How whistleblowing protection differs between the UK’s comparatively general statutory framework and the more fragmented, sector-specific US system.
How the two jurisdictions approach workplace harassment, occupational requirements, burdens of proof and employer defences.
Why UK working-time protections and US overtime rules regulate different aspects of the employment relationship.
How redundancy, American reductions in force, the WARN Act, TUPE and US successor-liability principles differ when jobs or businesses change hands.
How compensation, reinstatement, back pay, front pay, injury-to-feelings awards and mitigation of loss operate across the two systems.
Why procedural differences—including deadlines, Acas Early Conciliation, employment tribunals, administrative agencies and courts—can be just as important as the substantive legal right.
Which familiar workplace expressions should never cross the Atlantic unchanged without checking their jurisdiction-specific meaning.
How to ask the right legal questions before comparing a UK workplace problem with an apparently similar US claim.
Most importantly, why recognising a familiar doctrine should begin the analysis—not end it.